Boxing is barbaric and should be

It is not the place of the British Medical Association to decide upon the morals of society in cases such as this, where all participants participate of their own free will.

Headgear could be required e. All of the sports have a safety net, but boxing is the only sport that has none. In boxing the sole purpose of the participants is to hurt each other, while sick spectators derive sado-masochistic gratification.

Source The brutalities of a fight with bare hands, the crushed nasal bones, maimed lips, and other disfigurements, which call for the utter abolition of boxing in the interests of humanity, at Boxing is barbaric and should be disappear when the contestants cover their hands with large, soft-leather gloves.

That needs to happen with boxing.

Submission Rules

Boxing has existed in some form since at least BC when the ancient Greeks made it an Olympic game, but its history has often been a controversial one. Watching the Olympics we see there are safeguards for other fights, so why not apply them to boxing?

Lobby against motor racing or horse racing or do they lobby against some of the worlds real problems such as the torture of political opponents, forced female mutilation, killing and maiming of people for religious ends?

So many more people die in that sport. In sport, if you deliberately cause an injury to your opponent, you are usually disqualified.

There have been, for example, just three post-fight deaths in British boxing in the past 30 years. Source Boxing is the only sport you can get your brain shook, your money took and your name in the undertaker book. Also, it is about time people were allowed to make up their own minds.

However, what makes boxing different from for instance F1 racing, is that inflicting injury to other living beings is inherent to boxing. Charles Knight, UK "Those who mock boxing have never done it.

Boxing is also under the cosh and not for the first time. However, it should be both regulated and de-glamourised - the BBC should not be covering organised brutality of any sort.

Mike Packwood, UK Weight management and hydration should be handled better. Keir Smith, United Kingdom The safety of boxers must be paramount and everything that can be done should be done to ensure their safety. Patterson won the world heavyweight title aged 21, the youngest at the time.

He later boxed in Britain and Ireland. Critics argue that it causes physical harm, especially to the brain, and promotes violence. But does this action go far enough? Tony Rowe, Australia "A ban would drive it underground, with no saftety standards.

Arguments For and Against Banning Boxing

However, people do make the choice to participate. We must look at ways of increasing the safety of this noble art of self-defence. Keith Devereux, UK Boxing should not be banned, but I feel that public opinion will have the final say in the long run, as it will over fox hunting.

With all contact sports there is a certain amount of danger. The Marquess of Queensberry rules, drafted ineventually helped boxing to make the gradual transition into being a modern sport after a long period when it had possessed only dubious legitimacy.

Sev, UK Advancements in medical technology could be encouraged, in order to increase the effectiveness of a boxer by constantly monitoring their health during a fight. To do otherwise will infringe the liberties of people who make that choice. To compare two trained sportsmen fighting under a strict system of rules to some kind of street assault is simply stupid.

They know the risks and consent to going into the ring. Modern boxing rules date back to the late 19th Century and early 20th Century. Boxing match featuring Ricardo Dominguez. If people like Don King were forced out of boxing there would be fewer serious injuries.

Gordon Welch, UK When Ayrton Senna died, there were few calls for a ban on F1 racing, however, safety procedures were tightened and refined. Darren Allen, England Boxing should not be banned.

Fans of boxing argue that the sport promotes physical fitness and discipline. Without boxing, because of my neighborhoods, who knows what would have happened to me.

Ingle is still in a critical condition after surgeons operated to remove a blood clot from his brain.Boxing is more difficult.

Dr Miriam Stoppard: Boxing is barbaric and dangerous - let's put a stop to it

The compromise argument, that the sport should be made safer, is now irrelevant. The regulations requiring medics on standby are now as strict as they reasonably can be, and still Paul Ingle nearly died.

The one fact that cannot be legislated away is that boxing is dangerous.

Boxing Is Barbaric and Should Be Banned

Boxing is Barbaric and Should be Banned Cuts and bruises, broken ribs, internal bleeding, brain damage, death. Is the sport of boxing too much of a risk?

Although cockfighting and bearbaiting have been banned for several decades in most civilized countries, fistfights between people are still allowed. Dr Miriam Stoppard: Boxing is barbaric and dangerous - let's put a stop to it.

After looking through the stats, Dr Stoppard says that it would be "socially irresponsible" to allow boxing to continue. My experience with boxing comes from stories on HBO's real sports and a roommate who is obsessed with it. Him and his friends who watch boxing.

May 29,  · Critics, however, believe that boxing is barbaric, unacceptably dangerous and should be banned. Modern boxing developed in the UK and USA in the late 19th and early 20th Centuries. The Marquess of Queensberry rules, drafted ineventually helped boxing to make the gradual transition into being a modern sport after a long Reviews: “Boxing is a special case: no other sport has the express goal of inflicting injury on the brain” Corsellis put it best: “My opinion is that the brain should not be the target in any sport, and no amount of juggling with the regulations can take away the risk.

Boxing is barbaric and should be
Rated 0/5 based on 87 review